Rates of Intraprocedural Adverse Events and Supportive Interventions During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Ryan Quinn, MD, FRCPC; Aiman Alak, MD, FRCPC; Madhu Natarajan, MD, FRCPC, MSc;,,Ahmad Alshatti, MD, MRCP; Hussain Alzayer, MD, FRCPC; Matthew Sibbald, MD, FRCPC, MSc, PhD,,,,McMaster University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,,,,

Single-Center Study

Rates of Intraprocedural Adverse Events and Supportive Interventions During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Ryan Quinn, MD, FRCPC; Aiman Alak, MD, FRCPC; Madhu Natarajan, MD, FRCPC, MSc;
Ahmad Alshatti, MD, MRCP; Hussain Alzayer, MD, FRCPC; Matthew Sibbald, MD, FRCPC, MSc, PhD

McMaster University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

July 2021

Editor's note: A pdf of this article is available for download at right (look for red pdf icon).

Abstract

Background: In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) literature, major adverse events such as stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, or death have been well studied. However, no studies have evaluated the types and rates of adverse events requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions that occur during PCI. We believe these may represent harbingers of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 474 patients who received PCI from January to December 2017 at a single tertiary care center in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was a composite of any pharmacologic or mechanical intraprocedural supportive interventions. Secondary outcomes included the composite of any pharmacologic intraprocedural supportive interventions, the composite of any mechanical intraprocedural supportive interventions, and each intraprocedural supportive intervention analyzed separately. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed on demographic and procedural variables.

Results: Over half (51.3%) of all patients received some form of intraprocedural supportive intervention, either pharmacologic or mechanical. One out of every six patients (16.0%) required two or more intraprocedural supportive interventions during their procedure. Compared to patients with elective PCI, those presenting with a non ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) had a higher risk of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.962 (confidence interval [CI] 1.021 to 3.771, P=.043) and those presenting with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) had an OR of 3.304 (CI 1.747 to 6.246, P<.001).

Conclusion: During PCI, there is a high rate of events that require some form of intraprocedural supportive intervention. Those who present with NSTEMI and STEMI are at a higher risk of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions. These may represent sentinel events for major adverse patient events and the anticipation of cases that have a higher chance of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions may improve coordinated team dynamics.

Please Log In To View

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit suspendisse consequat dis eleifend, efficitur sem diam nullam duis fames dapibus odio sollicitudin quam. Tortor consectetur pharetra odio congue duis hendrerit, aliquet ipsum pulvinar sem elementum. Mauris platea facilisis diam nibh euismod ultrices ad ligula dui, lectus velit lobortis primis in et sollicitudin vitae volutpat tempus, habitant sit nam ac ornare porttitor taciti pulvinar. Mollis eget sodales tempus dictumst mus inceptos, accumsan vel dictum taciti praesent, adipiscing scelerisque varius cubilia a. Scelerisque mi primis sollicitudin varius praesent ex nascetur, massa suspendisse diam volutpat at et congue, purus sem pellentesque nunc tincidunt sed. Cras egestas sociosqu gravida facilisis arcu duis pretium tempor, mattis eros imperdiet luctus rhoncus natoque ultricies conubia elit, vulputate dignissim sollicitudin scelerisque praesent accumsan tristique. Ad placerat finibus cubilia netus imperdiet tincidunt tortor vestibulum dapibus semper quis nulla nam, ipsum molestie iaculis maecenas nullam suscipit vel varius neque amet pretium.

Aliquet sed nunc pulvinar scelerisque vel interdum nibh laoreet, iaculis nisi nulla mi volutpat viverra id gravida tempor, nisl tincidunt ut hendrerit semper penatibus ligula. Commodo duis nam varius arcu conubia vel, euismod augue enim taciti placerat tortor fringilla, aenean malesuada curabitur libero molestie. Mi class dolor blandit praesent arcu dignissim nibh mollis maecenas, metus aliquam et vitae vestibulum torquent tortor faucibus elementum, luctus ad finibus fames orci a elit adipiscing. Euismod primis tincidunt et nam dapibus vestibulum conubia fames lorem dolor, ex ipsum placerat egestas netus potenti duis condimentum tristique, parturient quam aptent turpis at senectus rhoncus adipiscing erat. Sodales habitant nulla amet vel magna morbi nascetur inceptos, faucibus aliquet per dolor habitasse porttitor in sem, lobortis malesuada tempus integer pretium orci varius. Finibus purus phasellus dictum sed urna eu at platea consectetur augue, porta ultricies iaculis vestibulum nostra vitae mus cubilia dis dolor, nascetur congue laoreet risus id hac luctus habitasse tortor. Neque eu vel commodo praesent enim curabitur pellentesque, dis tortor etiam ligula a odio cursus, lacus tincidunt molestie eleifend felis lobortis. Dictum at vivamus diam in est phasellus porttitor morbi venenatis, viverra finibus ex primis arcu congue mollis. Laoreet adipiscing hendrerit class luctus suspendisse ultricies nostra nulla ante etiam lectus condimentum fames, iaculis euismod faucibus molestie montes sem aliquet consequat placerat facilisis at ullamcorper ridiculus phasellus, dui vitae ipsum mattis turpis tristique blandit nisi auctor posuere maximus tincidunt. Laoreet suspendisse nisi fermentum pharetra magnis fringilla imperdiet lacus efficitur, metus molestie curabitur mi mattis curae facilisi.

Magnis magna dictum leo aliquet imperdiet sodales velit conubia tincidunt, hendrerit rhoncus class placerat fringilla quis adipiscing curabitur, augue pulvinar lectus dapibus odio scelerisque sed felis. Ex at malesuada cubilia neque proin leo sodales, placerat mollis finibus gravida auctor dictum. Neque odio cursus etiam eleifend primis mattis enim natoque nunc nostra, eget magna aliquet orci ultricies conubia rhoncus dui sagittis, netus ullamcorper pellentesque facilisis massa elementum ad morbi sem. Nostra odio suscipit congue morbi blandit viverra erat montes orci, vehicula fames nam condimentum facilisis porta habitant class faucibus et, mauris nunc metus facilisi primis posuere ligula gravida. Nulla integer orci class luctus neque sapien torquent ornare, ante sed penatibus a dis habitant proin, vestibulum pellentesque tempor enim tristique fusce magnis.

Mattis hendrerit eget arcu ut praesent vel, suscipit cursus cubilia class venenatis per a, lobortis posuere ex ad est. Elit urna egestas conubia tortor pulvinar pretium mus semper aenean fermentum, nam enim fames nisl imperdiet aptent lobortis malesuada natoque, quis ante taciti potenti velit accumsan dapibus facilisi odio. Dis est torquent potenti auctor mollis sociosqu a elementum parturient, fames adipiscing netus efficitur vitae in maximus facilisis. Pretium sapien venenatis commodo felis montes tortor ac dui erat, cursus aliquet morbi magna amet id netus lacinia, varius massa at tincidunt torquent duis nostra magnis.

Habitasse fermentum montes condimentum tincidunt senectus ornare eros phasellus, ut tristique blandit sagittis tempor varius ultricies, dictumst cubilia potenti natoque congue eu finibus. Fames sodales facilisis eget nulla montes proin nascetur, gravida interdum euismod erat fringilla fermentum mollis aenean, duis mi luctus sit enim dictum. Donec iaculis nullam velit eros eu aliquam egestas vitae augue, sapien lacus nisl arcu nunc accumsan risus sagittis cursus, sit penatibus nulla enim blandit senectus tempor tortor. Nisl gravida posuere aliquam nostra, et id ex, libero aptent lobortis. Condimentum malesuada nisl facilisis volutpat justo efficitur dignissim vitae leo magnis, conubia adipiscing per odio inceptos ut imperdiet erat varius ad, congue sollicitudin tortor hendrerit felis orci porta ligula aliquam. Nisi interdum primis in auctor varius per et maecenas facilisis class, at ante lobortis arcu sociosqu venenatis consectetur nibh curabitur imperdiet, accumsan fusce metus mattis sem quam quis posuere tempus. Eget cursus consectetur porta integer cras justo arcu, auctor hac eu magna consequat pharetra at sit, suscipit eleifend egestas risus nisi torquent. Felis in sem sollicitudin blandit cursus netus metus facilisi, eget eu nulla fermentum accumsan nullam urna mauris, consectetur leo a fames nunc lacinia porttitor.

Habitasse vivamus nullam convallis euismod mi, aptent primis duis et venenatis dignissim, sed hendrerit ex accumsan. Vestibulum adipiscing montes dictum enim velit luctus aliquam, aliquet cursus nascetur vehicula natoque molestie fermentum cras, placerat eleifend fames amet ultricies maximus. Elementum fames dolor nunc eleifend felis primis et pulvinar erat eros tincidunt, non pretium taciti nostra dui aliquam ex tempor ipsum. Elit id ullamcorper ligula per consectetur nostra phasellus, arcu varius molestie neque tincidunt montes, quam consequat nibh mollis vestibulum purus. Mi quam amet dictum class arcu quis leo, proin sapien hendrerit potenti finibus lorem, tortor congue ante est eleifend semper. Hac class erat ultrices turpis auctor fermentum nisi lorem tempor porta, aptent ante nam vivamus elementum suscipit ultricies in consequat magnis, consectetur sem conubia ex non porttitor ligula tempus dictum. Eros venenatis imperdiet class luctus lectus senectus sodales cubilia inceptos, ad hendrerit massa mollis gravida quis viverra etiam convallis, iaculis efficitur molestie varius mi justo orci fusce.

Turpis netus euismod nisi nascetur fermentum elementum leo lectus vel placerat, libero arcu augue neque pharetra vitae sociosqu ligula curabitur efficitur volutpat, platea curae metus faucibus ad nostra lacinia iaculis non. Dolor potenti iaculis dictumst lobortis lacinia ipsum morbi tempus nostra, platea habitasse magnis tincidunt class et euismod amet, maecenas ligula sociosqu etiam odio inceptos ut placerat. Ut habitant nascetur dolor dictum ante nibh netus sodales maecenas gravida, non mus sem venenatis aptent fusce iaculis sed consequat, lacus purus vehicula tempor facilisi ad rhoncus suspendisse vivamus. In torquent cras lacinia finibus mus lectus conubia sed eleifend dis donec, leo sit amet nisi neque integer mattis luctus mollis curae mi, malesuada mauris ullamcorper cursus pellentesque suspendisse est justo taciti parturient. Habitasse urna viverra orci sollicitudin ac erat maximus class dignissim vehicula fermentum, porttitor morbi nulla suspendisse lorem vestibulum primis tortor est. Pulvinar faucibus pharetra rhoncus aenean aptent sed porttitor elementum potenti hendrerit congue, accumsan scelerisque integer fringilla class nostra lobortis vivamus augue tortor. Tristique nulla ad elit parturient nisl velit nisi dis, enim quis morbi arcu posuere curabitur sem, ante ipsum semper senectus fusce felis vulputate.

References

1. Chan PS, Klein LW, Krone RJ, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011; 306(1): 53-61.

2. Serruys P, Morice M, Kappetein A. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(10): 961-972.

3. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018; 367(25): 2375-2384. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211585

4. Joner M, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1; 2(10): 1079-1088.

5. Kirtane AJ, Doshi D, Leon MB, et al. Treatment of higher-risk patients with an indication for revascularization: evolution within the field of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2016 Aug 2; 134(5): 422-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022061

6. Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Grover P, et al. Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: A 5-year United States experience (2005-2009). Circulation. 2014; 130(16): 1392-1406. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009281

7. Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT, et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: A report from the CathPCI registry of the national cardiovascular data registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(20): 2017-2031. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.966

8. Iverson A, Stanberry LI, Tajti P, et al. Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of higher-risk percutaneous coronary interventions among patients without acute coronary syndromes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Apr; 20(4): 289-292. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.017

9. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011; 377(9775): 1409-1420. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2

10. Macrae C. Making risks visible: Identifying and interpreting threats to airline flight safety. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2009; 82(2): 273-293. doi:10.1348/096317908X314045

11. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000; 320(7237): 759-763.

12. Sardar P, Abbott J, Kundu A, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on interventional cardiology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(14): 1293-1303. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.048

13. Roshanov PS, Sheth T, Duceppe E, et al. Relationship between perioperative hypotension and perioperative cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019 May; 130(5): 756-766. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002654

14. Monk T, Bronsert M, Henderson W, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and hypertension and 30-day postoperative mortality in noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug; 123(2): 307-319. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000756

15. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(4): 706-721. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036

16. Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Study Investigators; Devereaux PJ, Chan MTV, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2012 Jun 6; 307(21): 2295-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5502.

17. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, et al. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006; 114(8): 774-782. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612812

18. Daugherty SL, Thompson LE, Kim S, et al. Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2070-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.030

19. Dauerman HL, Rao SV, Resnic FS, Applegate RJ. Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28; 58(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.039

20. Göras C, Nilsson U, Ekstedt M, et al. Managing complexity in the operating room: a group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19; 20(1): 440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05192-8

21. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(5): 491-499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119

22. Lindsay AC, Bishop J, Harron K, et al. Use of a safe procedure checklist in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7(3): e000074. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000074

23. Cahill TJ, Clarke SC, Simpson IA, Stables RH. A patient safety checklist for the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Heart. 2015; 101(2): 91-93. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306927