Skip to main content
Abstracts 2312017

Impact of Pre-Operative Phone Calls on Post-Operative Patient-Initiated Inquiry Following Electrophysiology Procedures

Charlie Lin
EPLD Dr Lin winning abstract at Western AFib 2026

Abstract 2312017, presented at Western Atrial Fibrillation Symposium 2026

Elective Cardiac Electrophysiology (EP) procedures are frequently accompanied by details and specific follow-up needs in the peri-operative period. This can result in post-operative patient-initiated communication to the clinic or on-call services. We evaluated whether a brief pre-operative phone call on the day prior to the procedure may reduce redundant post-operative patient-initiated communication for peri-operative inquiries.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective EP procedures at a single center. All patients received a standard pre-operative call or electronic message from the care team, either with a nurse or medical assistant, in order to clarify the date and time of the procedure, as well as general instructions regarding pre-operative oral intake and arrangement of discharge transportation. Procedural details, pre-procedural medication management, post-operative recovery, and follow-up appointments were mentioned in standardized electronic documentation, but not verbally addressed during these encounters. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received a brief, physician-initiated pre-operative phone call the day before their scheduled procedure, and those who did not. Post-operatively, all patient-initiated communications related to the procedure, including phone calls and electronic messages, within 30 days post-procedure, were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-operative patient-initiated communication. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the significance level of differential outcomes and baseline characteristics.Patients who received a physician-led pre-operative phone call demonstrated a significantly lower rate of post-operative communication compared with those who did not (12/55 [21.8%] versus 26/55 [47.3%], p= 0.0087). Cohorts did not differ in their proportion of ablation, as opposed to device-related, procedures (39/55 [70.9%] versus 38/55 [69.1%], p = 1), nor in their frequency of native English fluency (51/55 [92.7%] versus 54/55 [98.2%], p = 0.3634).Proactive communication in the pre-operative setting may reduce redundancies in post-operative inquiries relevant to post-procedural recovery, medications, or follow-up appointment scheduling. This may result in streamlined post-operative care and patient satisfaction.